|
In Our Hands - Our World In Crisis
| |
| by Kay McLeod | |
| | |
|
For anyone wanting to find out more about the world we live in... there is one simple answer: read Noam Chomsky (The New Statesman, quoted on back cover of Chomsky, 2003, Hegemony Or Survival) | |
| | |
|
As many have warned us, the world is in ultimate crisis, Human frailty has placed not only the species at risk but also all other species and the globe itself.We are now extending our destructive activity beyond our own planet into the reaches of outer space. If we cannot halt the destructive drive for dominance which besets our species, then, quite frankly, the larger world would be better off without us. If we continue to adopt and obey a social system in which the strongest violators make the rules, there is no future. As Darwin has demonstrated, the evolution of species is determined by a simple rule: it is the strongest who survive. Our history shows that, for the human species, that has translated into the survival of the most violent. Violence itself has progressed from simple physical dominance to a comprehensive dominance of mind, body, and soul. With this progression has also come an expanding capacity for consciousness raising. With the expansion of consciousness comes the opportunity to turn things around.
Is this likely to happen? Our historical record and our present dire state would suggest not. A global dominant caste commanding vast weaponry, both physical and mental, is now running amok: global hegemony is its goal and extreme violence its method. Societyʼs own institutions are captured and ruthlessly deployed in this enterprise: the brute force of sophisticated military power; the comprehensive control of the global economy; the dismantling of national sovereignty; the manipulation of the population through the systemic denial of access to factual knowledge, the distortion of reality, the dismantling of social cohesion and personal integrity.
Nevertheless, hope is not lost and action is imperative. Change is a strange creature, sometimes incremental but, and this is where our hope can lie, often sudden, unexpected, a burst of creative energy which changes the world, a new approach, once discovered seemingly so obvious, so full of power - and all changes quite quickly. Why not now? The need is urgent.
In respect to Darwinʼs evolutionary insight, his recognition that species survival is determined by the survival of the fittest, it is now abundantly clear that the violent are no longer the fittest in terms of species survival, rather their continuing search for dominance is a global hazard bringing the species closer and closer to the point of extinction. Survival, fitness to survive, now lies with the other great human tendency - the capacity for rational thought and ethical behaviour. With this capacity as our guiding principle, we can evolve as a species, we can build better societies and halt the rule of violence in all its many forms.
There is an enormous body of information which documents the increasing risk we face as technology empowers an anti-democratic ruling elite to strive for world dominance whatever the cost to the rest of humanity and to the planet itself. More than enough is now known, now documented, regarding what is wrong and, as a community, we do not need to keep repeating ourselves, our existing body of knowledge is already enormous and irrefutable. All that those of us who do not yet know but are willing to know now require is access to this established body of knowledge, this key societal information. Their contribution also can then empower our progression towards the establishment of a safe and sane world.
Noam Chomsky is widely regarded as perhaps the greatest intellectual and foremost scholar of our times. For over 50 years, Chomsky has impeccably documented the threat to human and planetary survival which arose post the second world war and which has now escalated to the point where disaster is imminent. His “Hegemony or Survival” (2003) urgently brought to the worldʼs attention the short time remaining if we are to survive as a species and, as its title suggests, makes very clear the change of direction which is required if we are to have a future.
Chomskyʼs other works, both early and recent, provide ongoing insight into the critical issues we face. His research includes active and continuous personal contact with the “good examples” of the world, the successful and innovative efforts to create equitable society. His work also fully documents the need to go beyond the mainstream media and institutions if one is to understand what is happening in the world and to learn how others are acting to bring about a better world. Much is already being achieved to bring about change, good examples abound of countries, people, ideas, actions. This awareness needs to be sought for as knowledge of it is actively withheld.
Chomsky does not stand alone in identifying the danger we face and the urgent need for reform of our social system if we are to survive as a species. Other valuable sources of information include many individuals, many alternate news sites, enterprises, and organisations. The internet, alternate media, and social interaction are the means for ensuring that as many of us as wish to be aware, as wish to help avert catastrophe and create a new and better social order have the opportunity to do so. With this will come the change we need.
| |
| A Global Superpower | |
|
Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war? People will not face this alternative because it is so difficult to abolish war. (The Russell-Einstein Manifesto, issued in London, 9 July 1955) | |
| | |
| In 1955, Albert Einstein and Bertrand Russell, two of the greatest and most respected minds of the 20th century, wrote an urgent manifesto seeking to prevent world catastrophe. They involved distinguished scientists from across the political spectrum in support of their effort, as they believed that the public was not fully aware of the serious and irreversible threat posed to humanity by the development of nuclear weaponry. They hoped to achieve a change in the conduct of world affairs and their manifesto contained the following resolution We invite this Congress, and through it the scientists of the world and the general public, to subscribe to the following resolution: “In view of the fact that in any future world war nuclear weapons will certainly be employed, and that such weapons threaten the continued existence of mankind, we urge the Governments of the world to realize, and to acknowledge publicly, that their purpose cannot be furthered by a world war and we urge them, consequently, to find peaceful means for the settlement of all matters of dispute between them.”
This Manifesto was of critical importance to both men and constitutes a gift to humanity from them. Russell was already in his mid-eighties yet devoted himself to ensuring that an inaugural Scientific Conference followed the public release of the document. Einstein also was fully committed and, despite grave illness, worked on this with Russell right through to the final signing of the document itself. The signing of the final document, in the week before his death, was Einsteinʼs last public act.
Russell and Einstein understood that the world population needed to be adequately informed as it was only the world population itself which had the power to turn around the disastrous societal arrangements which were bringing the species to the point of extinction. They understood that governing elites have the power but not the will to change course, that they were trapped in a distorted world view and lacked the political will to change course. They placed their trust in an informed general public.
Russell and Einsteinʼs hopes in relation to the general public have not yet come to fruition. Their manifesto has really been withheld from the people for whom it was intended, very few of us have even heard of it, let alone read it, it is not part of the curriculum of any of our schools, it is not part of the general societal knowledge. As they rightly understood, the public needs to be informed before it can act effectively. Insights and knowledge which would help us do better with our construction of society are “disappeared”, not permitted to become part of our understanding of the world in which we live. Much else has also been withheld.
With the advent of a global society and a global communication system, we now have the opportunity to access all of this information and more if we so wish. We have the opportunity to establish global solidarity, to construct a better world together, better even for the global elites who so actively destroy what gives meaning and purpose to our lives and our universe. In 2003, the power residing in the general world population became very evident when the worldʼs mightiest nation, its only remaining superpower, declared its intention of attacking the people of Iraq. The illegality and immorality of this proposal was manifestly evident as was the bravado and arrogance with which this position was asserted. At the time, global opposition was so overwhelming and reached such unprecedented levels that “public opinion” was described by eminent thinkers as the second superpower. Russell and Einsteinʼs trust in the general public was upheld: when fully aware, the people of the world stand for common sense and decency, for justice and solidarity, for protection of the core values which sustain an ethical society.
It should then have been easy but it has not been so. Despite overwhelming global opposition, the global super power proceeded to wage its so-called war against a defenceless people. The unethical rule of force was on full display with the nature of “democracy” fully exposed. What then is the answer? An undemocratic ruling elite is seemingly incapable of changing direction, it will ride roughshod over the rest of society, it will govern in its own perceived self interest. The more power it captures, the less will it heed the principles of an ethical society.
Since 2003, we have seen this brutal war being waged more and more openly against the people of the world. The hegemonic nature of the warfare is highly visible: the waging of global war against all who might threaten hegemonic rule; the ruthless destruction and division of societies in the interests of hegemony, the use of proxies, false flags, media manipulation, digital imperialism, economic violence, and the enforced displacement of entire populations. Also Increasingly visible is the global war being waged against the citizenry of the so-called democracies, against those who seek an equitable and democratic society: the shameless economic violence masquerading as austerity, the panoptic surveillance of domestic populations, the dismantling of civil society, the militarisation of police forces trained to view a legitimately protesting population as the enemy, the unaccountable intelligence agencies devoted to the protection of the interests of the powerful hegemonic global minority.
What can we learn from this? Where is our voice now? Were we defeated and is there now no hope for a decent world? One might think that this is the case if one relied upon mass media and government propaganda. However, it is not the case. We already know with certainty that an informed general public stands for decency and justice in the conduct of world affairs. We also know with certainty that we have the capacity as human beings to create truly ethical societies: we have already demonstrated this capacity, although knowledge of our successes, our “good examples”, has been withheld from us as this knowledge poses a perceived and actual threat to the continuing rule of the global elite.
Great humanitarians have trusted in the people of the world, trusted in their honour, their good intentions, their commitment to the establishment of a just society. That is true of some of us, perhaps it was once true of more, but not yet has it been true of enough. Modern technology in the hands of the perpetrators is used to fundamentally alter the consciousness of the population: thus, populations as well as individuals can be rendered dysfunctional, unable to act in their own shared interest, blinded to the reality of their own oppression, dependent upon their oppressors. Dominance brings compliance, fear of violence brings psychological change, brute force is not the only means of bringing a population to heel.
| |
| Global Solidarity | |
| We are confronted with a system out of control, running amok, providing illusory gain for the few at the real expense of all. All lose as the gains so eagerly sought by those at the top destroy their own humanity and render their lives ugly, greedy, and bereft of all dignity. It is more than clear for those who are willing to see that violence no longer pays, that submission no longer pays, and that a new form of societal organisation is required if we are to survive, let alone thrive, as a species. Whether or not this is possible, now rests in our hands. If we are to succeed, we must stop deceiving ourselves, we must resist the lies and propaganda, we must recognise that our society is a plutocracy not a democracy and that this is the fundamental problem which places so much in jeopardy.
We do not need to deal directly with the elite caste, the dominating caste, we do not need to know all of their names, their crimes, their associations. Instead we ourselves, the larger population, simply need to act differently, to recognise our communal power and use that to cut to the chase and stop the abuse. In doing this, we most certainly do not need to use the old methods of violence, that would be self-defeating. The attempt to violently remove the offenders, the perpetrators, simply brings forth a new set of perpetrators who operate on the same principles of violence and dominance as before.
Rather, we need to recognise our own power. We are the majority, the functioning of society depends upon our compliance, our consumerism, our labour, our reproduction, our talent, our passivity. We need to do what each of us can now do and encourage others to do the same. Most importantly, we need to affirm ourselves as individuals and as a society. So many of us know that things are not right but feel powerless and helpless - we need to communicate with one another, to reclaim solidarity, to disallow violence, and to act positively and productively.We have been described as a global superpower, it is essential that we gain our confidence and follow through on this, that we peacefully build a social system which is a true democracy, a social system in which justice not dominance is the guiding principle.
We will need to actively maintain our solidarity in this and not succumb to the age-old “divide and conquer” strategy which for centuries has broken community solidarity and placed the most successful bully in power. Change becomes possible when we are clear about the need for change and when we act in non-violent solidarity with one another. That is all that is required. Without our support, the elite caste is no longer able to maintain its dominance, to carry out its wars, to maximise its profits, to wreak havoc in the world which is the home of all of us.
With such an approach in place, our soldiers can lay down their arms and work for planet recovery - our soldiers are people, people like us, all they need is encouragement and solidarity. There is a vast network of military people who speak against the war and quite probably this is how the majority of our soldiers would respond if they were free to do so, if they were given the encouragement to do so.
With such an approach, our food providers can again earn an honest living in providing healthy produce, all they need is our support, our willingness to boycott the rapacious corporations and instead support them. We need to withdraw our support from all enterprises which are exacting inordinate profits through the abuse of labour, the abuse of the taxation system, the abuse of global resources and global communities.
We can do all of this and more now. Easily. We need to do it together. We need to encourage one another and to build community and global solidarity. We need to do all that we can, tokenism is not enough. We will need to forgo some of our habits, notably our habits of excessive consumption. Also our habit of gullibility, our habit of forgoing responsibility. This is our planet and we are all responsible for its well being.
The global elite caste simply cannot exercise its power if the world population resists effectively, acts effectively. Boycotts are effective, we know that, we need to generalise that principle. Organisation and solidarity are effective, we know that too, we need to reclaim that. We do not need to make a noise about it, we simply need to do it. Creativity finds new solutions, opens new horizons, we know that too.
Today, in a world rushing towards disaster, visibly tearing itself apart, with human misery everywhere, we can no longer carry on as though there is no problem, no obligation, no emergency. We can no longer step back and leave it all to the perpetrators to do as they will, and to the few who struggle to restore decency against overwhelming odds. In this we would have no excuse, no excuse at all. We have the power to create a better world. and the responsibility for this is in our hands.
In our name, the global elite is bringing war and destruction, deprivation and death to the many peoples of the world on a global scale never before experienced. We become complicit if we merely occupy the position of bystander, choosing to remain uninformed, retreating to the comfort of our own small world, accepting the lies of our rulers whilst mayhem rages around us. The bystander is not innocent, the bystander is the enabler.
| |
| An Ethical Society | |
| We are a gifted species technologically yet remain a flawed species societally. We could achieve much were we simply to acknowledge this flaw in our being and thus be in a position to address it in a systematic and effective manner. Historically, we have organised our human societies around the principle that power and privilege is to be held by the ruling group of the time. Dominance and hierarchy have been the mechanisms for the establishment of the prevailing social order. This is a common form of social organisation for many species but with the state of technological advancement now reached by the human species, it creates a societal flaw which we need to address.
Societies which are governed by principles of dominance and hierarchy are constitutionally unable to create conditions of equity and justice, instead being ruled by the principle of self interest. In such societies, self interest rules both the dominant class and the submissive class. A form of social organisation is required which does not leave ruling power in the hands of the self-interested, whether this be an actual ruling minority or a self interested enabling majority. In an advanced technological society, such a form of societal organisation is not sustainable as the escalation of violence is predictable, demonstrable, and catastrophic. Good governance can only be achieved where ethics themselves rule in the interest of all, and all are held subservient to the rule of ethics. Human reason gives us the means to establish this and also shows us the necessity for it.
We are fortunate that an inherent characteristic of our species, present from the beginning, is a deep sensitivity and commitment to the concept of justice. We share this awareness in its primitive form with other species also, the knowledge of what is fair and what is not fair. It is this characteristic which now needs to be established as the basis for a social order which does not threaten us with life extinction as does a technologically advanced society in which the social order is based upon dominance and hierarchy, upon self interest rather than the common good. Our sense of justice provides us with the basis for a developed understanding of the preeminence which needs to be given to ethics, of what it means to lead an ethical life and to establish an ethical society.
Many of our early thinkers were following this path of thought, although expressing it through the concepts of their time. Thus, Plato came to the conclusion that society should be governed by its philosophers as their particular skill was the study of ethics and their lifestyle could be such as to remove the deleterious temptations of self-interest. A society which is governed by ethical principles is, by definition, a just society in which equity and opportunity have replaced dominance and hierarchy. An ethical society is a sustainable society, a society no longer at risk of self-annihilation. As with our technological development, advances in our societal development will only occur over time as we become more proficient in the skill of basing our social order on the principle of equity rather than that of self-interest, on the rule of ethics rather than the rule of dominance and hierarchy.
Like Plato. we may conclude that our mechanism for social organisation, for now at least, needs to be the continuance of rule by an elite minority, a minority which would achieve and hold its position by virtue of its capacity for ethical rule, for ensuring that justice and equity provide the basis for social order and governing power is wielded only in the interest of the common good. An informed democracy might well choose this path as the most efficient means of assuring the desired outcome. In this event, an informed democracy would need to ensure that government was participatory, democratic, and concerned with the advancement of the common good. A manipulated and uninformed “democracy” would simply continue to permit an undemocratic elite to rule in its own self interest.
Is the desired change possible? Seemingly, there is nothing to stop us but our own nature, and that nature is not an implacable given. Nature is important but environment also counts. Unfortunately our oppressors know this and have efficiently created a social environment which supports the system of dominance and submission, the rule of self interest and its associated abrogation of conscience and consciousness. We can turn this around. We are the majority, and we too can consciously create a social environment of our choosing. We now have the means and the opportunity to do just that, to act in solidarity and together establish a sustainable global society where ethics rule in the interest of all, where ethics is established as the governing force in the minds of the majority of us and in the actuality of our lives.
The examples are already there for us, their success hidden from our sight. Many successful societies following principles of justice and equity have been established by inspired movements, ethical elites and leaders, and have flourished unless brought down by the violent forces of those seeking to preserve a social order which perpetuates wrongful privilege and power. Oppressive power elites greatly fear the”domino effect” which such societies provide as an example and encouragement to the people of the world. Global solidarity is the means we have for ensuring that we are able to protect these successful societies. When the global elite no longer has our support, our cooperation, it is not able to bring its destructive force to bear on our societies.
With the rule of ethics established as the governing force in our minds and our societies, global solidarity will ensure that we continue to evolve as a sustainable society, that our efforts cannot be derailed by self interested minorities. We can each contribute and each enjoy the contribution of others and the progress of society as a whole. So long as we remain informed and ethical, conscious of our individual and shared responsibility, we will be able to live in the society towards which we have striven for so long.
| |
| Cultural Change | |
| We cannot allow certain interests - interests which are global but not universal - to take over, to dominate states and international organizations, and to continue destroying creation (Pope Francis, speaking in Bolivia, 10 July 2015) | |
| We in the West need to unlearn a great deal of what has been imposed on us. For us, more than for others, it is a struggle to see the reality of the world in which we live. Our western propaganda system is immensely powerful and has been part of our socialisation from the beginning of our lives. We need to unlearn much of what we have been inculcated with. Just as children, despite all evidence to the contrary, will continue to believe in the goodness and wisdom of their abusive parents, so too citizens of the west have generally believed in the goodness, even the superiority, of their social system.
Yet, it is we in the west whose governments have followed an imperialistic, exploitative, and murderous global agenda. The Anglo Empire in particular has been a continuous force for world dominance and has brought us to the critical point we now face. Technology has empowered it, together with its associates, to threaten us all with extinction at the worst and slavery at the best. As westerners, many of us now recognise that it has been in our name that the forces of imperialism and hegemony have for so long brought so much suffering and tragedy to the world. More of us are now aware of our particular responsibility, our shared responsibility, and are actively working to overcome the tyranny we have endured for so long. We are part of the very broad global efforts to restore balance and humanity to the world in which we live.
Our western efforts are essential in this, as it is we who have the responsibility and the capacity to ensure that our governments no longer act as the vassals of those seeking hegemonic power. The activities of this antidemocratic minority are increasingly spinning further and further out of control and becoming more and more dangerous as they do so. We may now have reached the critical point which will determine whether we progress as a global society or whether we fail. In the face of this possibility, we are fortunate that the global opposition to the drive for hegemony which is threatening us all, has at last been taken up, almost simultaneously, by powerful and diverse leaders from across the globe.
These leaders are unanimous in calling out the perpetrators of the threat to our survival and are insistent upon the need for our global society to now be established on ethical principles in the interest of all. This change in the dynamics of global power has occurred suddenly and has been surprising in many ways. Most of all it has been uplifting.
Speaking to the world, both in person and by papal encyclical, the current Pope has mounted an impressive and effective campaign for the protection of the earth and for justice for its people. He has not held back from naming the problem. We could not have anticipated that we would be so fortunate as to have a Pope who would speak and act so strongly against the excesses of capitalism.
Even more surprisingly, at least for many in the western world, we find Russia, historically the demonised enemy of both the church and the western world, also leading the way in the effort to return sanity to the world. A powerful address by the Russian President to the United Nations named the hegemonic problem with its associated rise of terrorism, and recommended a cooperative global response under international law to what is now an increasing and very dangerous global problem.
A number of other global “leaders”, many again unexpected, are challenging the rogue drive for hegemony and speaking up for global ethics in society. We can continue to expect that some but not all of the ruling elite will join this effort to reverse direction and establish good sense and ethics in society. The European Union has recently offered its support to Edward Snowden, recommending that he be offered political asylum by member states.The American president is now campaigning strongly for the protection of the environment and for global action on climate change. The Chinese president has made major commitments towards the protection of the environment and the prevention of global warming. Iranʼs prime minister continues to be a strong voice for peace and diplomacy and is a strong advocate for the establishment of a nuclear free zone in the Middle East.
In Britain, we have a newly elected opposition leader opposing war, decrying the exploitations of capitalism, and demanding social justice. The Scottish National Party, a strong parliamentary voice in Britain, also speaks up strongly for social justice and in opposition to the continuation of the very dangerous Trident nuclear weaponry program. The newly elected government of Canada has a very strong popular mandate for a change of direction, and upon election immediately withdrew its forces from the destructive Middle East military enterprise. The Australian public has obliged its neoconservative government to replace its reactionary Prime Minister with a more moderate leader.
South America has perhaps taken the lead, and for some time now, in establishing its societies on ethical principles. Their successful embrace of social justice and continental solidarity has allowed them to protect one another from the more vicious onslaughts of the hegemonic enterprise, whilst also extending their voices in the interests of global solidarity. In South America, we have seen a rise in living standards as the well being of all is supported and nations offer fraternal support to one another.
Importantly, we are at last seeing global recognition of the leadership and example provided to us by the indigenous peoples of the world. Bolivia, for example, has a strong indigenous community from whose courage and wisdom it has greatly benefited. Despite its small size and impoverished status, it yet stared down the global corporations in their attempts to privatise the nationʼs water supply. Ecuador, drawing on the long held understandings of its indigenous population, became the first nation in the world to incorporate the rights of nature into its constitution.
Australia too is now drawing on the knowledge and wisdom of its indigenous people. Only recently has it been documented that the pleasing pastoral landscape which was so admired by the newly arriving Europeans in 1788 was a product of the indigenous people whose advanced land management skills developed in harmony with the environment over some 40,000 years. Contemporary efforts are now being directed towards applying this knowledge to the land management of modern Australia and it is to be hoped that leadership in this will be vested in the indigenous community itself where some of the traditional knowledge and sensitivities are still held.
In the west, we are also drawing on the wisdom of our own earlier understandings. We are remembering the primary and essential importance of our connection with nature, our at-oneness with nature, and seeking to restore balance to ourselves and to the world in which we live. We are remembering the historical place of ʻthe commons” in our early societies and developing cultural awareness and legislative protection for ourselves, for future generations, and for nature in relation to this fundamental principle. We are also now able to draw on our own important contemporary research which establishes unequivocally that the more equitable a society is the better it does on all measures of social wellbeing, and conversely, that the less equitable a society, the greater the social dysfunction on all measures. Much will change as we consolidate these understandings.
Far-reaching acts of creative leadership are increasingly being provided by ethical individual across the globe. In Australia, the courage and decency of Adam Goodes,an indigenous footballer, has led to a successful national campaign against the racist and bullying behaviour of sections of the football following public. Of note was the very positive public response to this campaign when the institutional voices of the football industry and the mainstream media chose to speak up strongly, if belatedly, showing their capacity to both identify racism and bullying and to call them out. Similarly, again in Australia, the strong voice of a few individuals opposing domestic violence, together with institutional support, has at last led to broad public identification of the dynamic involved in such violence.
The opportunity is now there for a comprehensive change in the direction of the conduct of world affairs. The role of the general public will be paramount, An informed and ethical general public will be able to ensure that the opportunity to establish a new direction is brought to fruition and that those who seek world dominance will no longer be able to manipulate the public into supporting such an enterprise. As we progress from being a society of leaders and followers, let us learn to follow only those “leaders” who demonstrate a capacity to oppose dominance and affirm ethics as the guiding principle of our societies. Let us concurrently also be sure to recognise, endorse and support all other acts of ethical leadership wherever they may arise. And let us ourselves also contribute positive leadership in the establishment of ethical society. November 2015
| |
| .............. | |
| Chomsky Noam, 2003, Hegemony Or Survival: Americaʼs Quest for Global Dominance, Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest NSW Gammage Bill, 2011 The Biggest Estate on Earth: How Aborigines made Australia, Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest NSW Gold Irma, 2012, A Chat with Bill Gammage - You Tube Kerry Bill, Picket Kate & Wilkinson Richard, 2009, The Equality Trust, https://www.equalitytrust.org.uk Pickett Kate & Wilkinson Richard, 2010,The Spirit Level: Why Equality Is Better for Everyone, Penguin Books, London Pilger John, 2015, Why the Rise of Fascism is Again the Issue, www.johnpilger.com Pope Francis, 2015, Encyclical on Climate Change and Inequality: Our Care for Our Common Home, Melville House, London Putin Vladimir, 2015, 70th session of the UN General Assembly, http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/ 50385 Russell Bertrand & Einstein Albert, 1955, The Russell-Einstein Manifesto, http://pugwash.org/1955/07/09/ statement-manifesto/ | |